Saturday, June 30, 2012

The Virgin Mary - Really???

I don't believe in miracles or fables. Therefore, I need concrete proof that Mary, the mother of Jesus was a virgin. Does anyone have proof of this as I am not going to "just believe?"

In addition I have not yet received any concrete information to my question as to how the earth could have been populated from Adam, Eve and Cain? There appears to be only one branch on this "storied" tree (incest.) There was no one else on earth other than these three immediate family members. It is important to speak to just the period of time of the Garden of Eden. Anything that happened later is not about this time frame.

Remember in answering my questions, it is not nice to preach and call me a sinner (which is judgmental as no one knows my relationship with God.) The questions need to be answered with concrete proof and should be directed at the actual questions being asked and not using scriptures that have no relevance.

Roberta M. Helming

Amazing Writing from an Established Author and Columnist

An established author and columnist is available to meet your writing needs – letters, flyers, inspirational sayings, newsletters, business cards, letterheads, invitations – birthdays, weddings or anniversaries. I’ll write sayings with or without photos suitable for matting and/or framed gifts. Tell me your needs, I’ll write and design. Prices are reasonable. Call Roberta M. Helming at Elegant Impressions – 860-908-9053.

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Roberta M. Helming - Christian Creation Story Question for All


So anyway, translate Adam, Eve, Cain and Abel to today's time - June 17, 2012.
 
If Adam and Eve brought Cain and Abel into the world - and Abel died, leaving only Adam, Eve and Cain (now remember we're pretending the Garden of Eden is now, in the present, today and no other people but these three exists.)
 
How could any other procreation beyond Adam and Eve happen without incest? Who was there for Cain to procreate with? All I want to know is who Cain procreated with when, other than him, there were only his parents.
 
I'm being asked to think that procreation didn't happen as a result of incest, but not being told what other alternative there was since there was no other woman but Eve on the earth.
 
Was it a magical thing like the virgin birth?
 
With regard to insulting the intelligence of someone you don't know who is asking these questions, these are not the kinds of things that a person with limited mental capacity could think of. Hence, it is better to answer the question than to use insults. Are insults towards a person trying to resolve one's issues of faith Christian like? Would your answers to someone struggling with issues of the Christian faith be pleasing to God?
 
One's lack of understanding regarding an apparent flaw in the Bible about the creation story doesn't equate to making derrogatory comments and name calling. All is does is places Christianity in a very negative light. And if I know Christians are going to call me names because I don't feel something that is over-the-top complex makes sense, how is that going to bring me closer to God.
 
Why not ask your pastor my creation story question and post an anwer that seems to make sense?
 
I will not judge those who resort to name calling in the name of God for only they and God know their heart.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Roberta M. Helming: True Happiness Isn't Found in Today's Techno-Gagets


Having none of the modern conveniences of today, the lives of early Homo Sapiens was difficult, but so are our lives – despite all the modern conveniences. It seems as though the early Homo sapiens had an overall better life, regardless of the fact that their very existence required them to forge for food and firewood, exercise and socialize.


Now let’s fast forward to the 21st century where we find the unquenchable need in some individuals for every modern convenience of our time – something that is slowly killing us. Among us has evolved individuals wanting (in an almost instinctual manner) the latest and greatest “toys” available – even “camping” outside of Best Buy in order to be among the first to get the latest and greatest devices. This instinct actually runs counter to the species from which we evolved.


Two hundred thousand years ago, Homo sapiens didn’t seek out material possessions for themselves only. They were actually part of a hunter and gather society, sharing their responsibilities and their findings, basic staples – food and firewood, with others.

Instinctually, they knew that in order to survive, they had to work in bands (small groups) and they forged for food. And special attention was given to helping expectant mothers or mothers who had just given birth to ensure the newborn survived and could benefit the band in the future. (No “Single Welfare Moms” 200,000 years ago.)


They were very socially, responsible, interacting not by cell phones and Facebook, but rather one-on-one, up close and personal. This brought them a more peaceful lifestyle, living true to the manner in which their bodies and minds had evolved. Now we, including our minds, evolved from this and our minds are still geared toward hunting and gathering and social interaction.


Unfortunately, in our society, we have less and less human interaction. As an example, just last week, while attempting to contact a human being via a telephone, regarding an on-line question, I was asked by an answering machine to leave my e-mail address – not a phone number. Is this the “wave” of the future?
The early Homo sapien hunters and gatherers’ life kept them healthy and at a good weight. For in order for them to eat they had to work, be active. The nature of their survival required them to exercise. Our problem today – one doesn’t even have to leave the car to go into Burger King, rather one can drive up and order the double Whopper with supersized fries and a milk shake.


Like the early Homo sapiens, our bodies are meant to exercise and socialize. And without both, the resultant sedentary lifestyle, primarily of hiding behind electronic devices, has brought to our society an alarming amount of obesity and resultant illnesses.


We truly could learn a lot from the early Homo sapiens. They had to be resourceful, creative, and adaptive. They had to possess the inner desire to work to take care of themselves during the daytime hours. And at the end of the day, they built their fires and interacted face-to-face with those in their group.

Bringing this all around to today, Facebook is not to be excluded from people’s lives, but it needs to be kept in perspective and coupled with some quality social activities. And since we also need exercise, it could be fun to organize a group of Facebook or other friends into an introductory exercise program, i.e., walking through the mall or parking the car a little farther from the store.


It is key to realize that purchasing the latest gadget isn’t going to make our lives easier and make us happier. It is more likely going to add complexity, especially if we buy it on credit and have to determine how to pay for it – perhaps requiring a second job.


A lifestyle change whereby we are not slaves to our possessions is key, for it frees up our day to sit on the lawn and read a book or go to the beach. The less possessions we are slaves to, requiring less work, the more time we have to engage in a pleasurable activity.


It is worth noting that in seeking happiness in possessions, true happiness will never be found. The permanent address for happiness is in our minds, hearts and souls. In not finding it there, one must evaluate and come to understand what must be done in order to reach those fountains of happiness that are ours to claim from within.


We only have one life, remove the “electronic” toxicity and realize no matter one’s age, a brief moment of happiness is better than decades of misery.


© Roberta M. Helming
kulwckifan@aol.com

Saturday, June 9, 2012

The too often used term "Single Mom" is not a badge of courage across the board. Of course women who have been in a committed relationship or marriage where it doesn't work out and they find themselves "single" and "moms" should wear their title with pride and courage. For they at least attempted to bring their children into the world within a committed relationship.

Those women however, who have sex with someone they barely know without using protection and conceive a child are not doing their civic duty. For even before the baby is born, welfare and all of its co-existing benefits kicks in, beginning with prenatal care and WIC. And when the baby is born "Welfare Moms" are entitled to government subsidised money, subsidized rent, SNAP, free cell phones, medicaid - just to name some of the many government programs available. All of this, because they took no care while engaging in sexual activity - usually with a man who will be unable to pay child support.

Instead of spending all this money on women who seem to act more instinctually than rationally, why don't we send these individuals back home to their families to live a multigenerational life, as we used to do. Perhaps the realities of having to live with one's parents again would cause one to pause before quickly having another child with someone they barely know.

For it would be wiser to spend this money on the needs of those who bravely served our country. They seem to have to wait for their care, while "Welfare Moms," without fail, receive their money every month. And while it may be thought that having a baby is one's private right, it becomes not so when one can't afford to rear the child from their own funds. If it takes the welfare system to help raise a child, it is the tax payers who are actually raising said child.

Many children suffer and live in poverty because their mother decided to have a night of unprotected fun. Is it fair to that child? Hence, if you can't afford to raise a child on your own, cross your legs until you can. It will be better for you and your child.

There are so many people playing on society's sympathy with the famous line: "But I'm a Single Mom." Yes, and that was your choice for who thinks a man known for two weeks, that one sleeps with and becomes impregnated by is going to stick around to raise a child? And what about a woman with three children, with three different last names on - all on welfare?

For anyone who wants to be a "Single Mom" if things don't work out after being in a committed relationship, you deserve all the help our welfare system can give. But for those who want to start out being a "'Welfare Moms," don't call yourself a "Single Mom" - that has the connotation of trying to do the right thing in having children. "Welfare Moms" should be ashamed of themselves, acting in an irresponsible way and then feeding of the government - i.e., the taxpayers.www.elegantimpress.com